Assignments for ECED 702
Research Proposal - Comments
We found your research proposal interesting and well worth pursuing. We believe you will need to add lexical semantics to vocabulary when considering this study on writing. Throughout you made statements that needed citations. In the future you need to be more careful about that. APA style was not accurate in a couple places.
eced_702_research_proposal_-_sawyerr.pdf | |
File Size: | 175 kb |
File Type: |
Annotated Bibliography - Comments
The articles you reviewed are done well and clear. Detail is provided in most aspects except in the area of participant description. Ages and grade level were not apparent in some. You mention that measures were not detailed enough in articles. Thanks for all the extra work to find information on measures on the web, etc. Authors often expect readers to look at previous publications for measures used in a current study as they often repeat measures in every article. There were articles with participants and topics with older students. It would have been best to explain the reasons for this. You explained some about this in the past during your seminar facilitation but it should have also been included here. The first reference is not in APA style. There were some grammatical problems in your writing overall.
Your feedback to your peers was exemplary. Your comments were specific and showed that you learned quite a bit and reflected upon others annotated bibliographies.
The articles you reviewed are done well and clear. Detail is provided in most aspects except in the area of participant description. Ages and grade level were not apparent in some. You mention that measures were not detailed enough in articles. Thanks for all the extra work to find information on measures on the web, etc. Authors often expect readers to look at previous publications for measures used in a current study as they often repeat measures in every article. There were articles with participants and topics with older students. It would have been best to explain the reasons for this. You explained some about this in the past during your seminar facilitation but it should have also been included here. The first reference is not in APA style. There were some grammatical problems in your writing overall.
Your feedback to your peers was exemplary. Your comments were specific and showed that you learned quite a bit and reflected upon others annotated bibliographies.
eced_702_annotated_bibliography.docx | |
File Size: | 30 kb |
File Type: | docx |
ECED 702 Seminar
eced_702_seminar.pdf | |
File Size: | 123 kb |
File Type: |
ECED 702 Weekly Questions and Reflections - Comments
We appreciated your thoughtful and insightful comments and reflections.
We appreciated your thoughtful and insightful comments and reflections.
ECED 702 Attendance and Participation - Comments
Thank you for all your contributions to class. We believe as you moved through the semester you became more aware of a research/scholarly orientation in your discussions. This is important for a PhD program student.